Author Topic: Ownership of the Monon in the late 1890 and early 1900's  (Read 5282 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Stew Winstandley

  • Monon Engineer
  • ****
  • Posts: 293
Ownership of the Monon in the late 1890 and early 1900's
« on: February 15, 2012, 10:03:19 pm »

  August 11, 1898
 
  Oakland Tribune
  Monon Absorbed By The Big Four
 
  New York, Aug. 11—A controlling interest in the Chicago,
  Indianapolis and Louisville Railroad, better known as the
  Monon, has been acquired by the Big Four, says the Herald,
  and negotiations are under way for the acquisition of the
  Cincinnati, Hamilton and Dayton.
 
  The latter deal, however, has not been perfected, although
  it is believed in Wall Street that it is only a question of
  a few days before an agreement will be reached.
 
  The Big Four, or Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago and
  St. Louis Railroad, is controlled by the Vanderbilt’s, and
  this road is operated in such close connection with the
  Chesapeake and Ohio that gossip has intimated that it is a
  part of the deal that the Chesapeake road shall be
  eventually take into the enlarged Big Four system.
 
  Strictly speaking, a majority of the Monon stock has been
  acquired by the financial interests that control the Big
  Four, not by the railroad proper, although the effect is
  the same, and it is understood to be the intention to turn
  the property over to the Big Four at no distant date.
 
  The acquisition of the Monon will give the Big Four an
  entrance of its own into Chicago, over the Chicago and
  Western Indiana track. The Big Four has been dependent
  upon the Illinois Central for an entrance into Chicago,
  having to pay for the use of fifty-six miles of tracks.
 
  The acquisition of the Monon will add 535 more miles to the
  Big Four’s system of 1,838 miles, and if it secures the
  Cincinnati, Hamilton and Dayton, which has 641 miles, it
  will have a combined mileage of 3,015 miles. In addition
  to this the Big Four operates nearly four hundred miles of
  other tracks.


  June 23, 1900
 
  Logansport Pharos
  Reported Sale Of The Monon
 
  Chicago, June 23—The report was current that the Monon
  Railroad had been sold to the New York Central.  It was
  said that officials of the New York Central road took a
  trip over the Monon Route yesterday morning, and that the
  papers of transfer were drawn up in the afternoon.


  August 7, 1900           
 
  The Fort Wayne Evening Sentinel
  AFTER THE MONON.
 
  Indianapolis Journal: "It has been currently reported
  in New York financial circles that J. P. Morgan & Co.
  have sold their holdings in the Monon railroad to the
  Pennsylvania and Vanderbilt interests. Such rumors are not
  new, but they come this time with more than the usual
  authenticity, and some credence is being given them. It is
  said that the Pennsylvania wants a short line to Chicago
  from Indianapolis, and the Monon is the shortest of all. The
  Pennsylvania now leases the Lake Erie and Western from
  Indianapolis to Logansport, and does not own a
  through line to Chicago. If it acquires the Monon it will
  have things its own way. The Vanderbilts also want the Monon
  to keep it from interfering with the Big Four."



  May 15, 1902
 
  New York Times
  Monon Railroad Purchased
 
  The Louisville and Nashville and the Southern Railway
  jointly have purchased the Chicago, Indianapolis and
  Louisville better known as the “Monon Route.” This statement
  is made on the highest authority, although a definite
  official announcement could not be obtained yesterday.
 
  The financier, who desired to have his name withheld, said
  that he was not at liberty to disclose the details of the
  transaction, as these had better come from official sources.
 
  The above statement confirms, in a measure, the many
  reports of a contemplated consolidation of the Chicago,
  Indianapolis and Louisville with one of these two Southern
  railway systems and it means that hereafter the Southern
  Railway and the Louisville and Nashville will have and
  absolutely control an independent entrance into Chicago.
 
  The affairs of the Louisville and Nashville and the
  Southern Railway have been prominently in the public eye
  since the events of last month, when the control of the
  Louisville and Nashville was wrested from August Belmont and
  his associates and was lodged in the hands of J.P. Morgan &
  Co., mainly, so it was said, through the efforts of John W.
  Gates, who had bought control of the property and who was
  said to have sold it to the Morgan’s.
 
  A great many people, however, profess still to believe that
  the outcome of the Gates purchases in Louisville and
  Nashville was premeditated, and that the “corner” in the
  stock was averted, not because Mr. Gates wanted to give away
  more profits, but because his principals saw that they had
  control, which was all they wanted. Since then both
  Louisville and Nashville and Southern Railway have been
  very strong. When the stock of the Chicago, Indianapolis
  and Louisville began to show strength some two weeks ago,
  rumors that it had been or would be purchased for one or
  the other of these companies became very thick.
 
  President McDoel of the Chicago, Indianapolis and
  Louisville, while denying that the road had been sold,
  admitted that such a purchase would be a logical one for
  the two Southern systems, which he said would someday have
  to get into Chicago without depending on their connections.
  This has now been accomplished.
 
  The Chicago, Indianapolis and Louisville controls a line
  of road from Louisville to Chicago, with good terminal
  facilities in both cities.
 
  The entrance of the road into Louisville is via the
  Kentucky and Indiana bridge which it owns jointly with the
  Baltimore and Ohio and the Southern Railway. From there
  the road runs via New Albany, Ind., to Michigan City, a
  distance of 289 miles. The entrance into Chicago is by the
  Chicago and Western Indiana, in which the Monon has a one-
  fifth interest. There is also a line from Indianapolis to
  the Indiana State line, a distance of 162 miles, and the
  road has several branches, so that its total mileage
  reaches 546 miles.
 
  The amount of stock authorized and issued is $5,000,000
  preferred and $10,500,000 common stock, making a total of
  $15,500,000. On the preferred stock semi-annual dividends
  of 2 percent have been paid since October, 1900. The
  company has a funded debt of $13,542,000. J.P. Morgan &
  Co. acquired a controlling interest in the company in the
  Spring of 1899, but the road has been operated separately
  and in dependently, although it has not been a rate
  disturber.
 
  The Louisville and Nashville is a system of about 4,000
  miles, and its main line runs from Louisville and
  Cincinnati to New Orleans. It has many branches and
  reaches almost every important city in Kentucky,
  Tennessee, and Alabama. The Southern Railway is a system
  of some 5,000 miles, and it has been known as a Morgan
  road since 1893, when the property was reorganized.


  August 16, 1902
 
  Fort Wayne Sentinel
  Morgan Makes Big Profit
 
  New York, Aug. 16—On an investment of nothing the latest
  syndicate formed by J. Pierpont Morgan has received a
  profit of $302,300. The money was paid to the syndicate
  formed by Mr. Morgan to take over the Monon Railroad for
  the Southern Railway and Louisville and Nashville.  The
  absorption of the road apparently required the service
  of an underwriting syndicate and Mr. Morgan sent out the
  usual notices inviting subscriptions.

  There was the usual ready response, for Mr. Morgan’s
  syndicates are popular because of the big profits they
  usually bring to their members. As it turned out it was
  not necessary for the syndicate to subscribe one dollar.



  October 20, 1902
 
  Fort Wayne News
  Complain Of Railroad Trust
 
  Washington, Oct. 20—The complaint of the railroad commission
  of Kentucky against the Atlantic Coast Line Company, Atlantic
  Coast Line Railroad Company, Louisville, L & N Railway
  Company, Southern Railway Company, Southern Railway Company
  in Kentucky, Southern Railway in Indiana, Cincinnati, New
  Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Company, Cincinnati Couther
  Railroad Company, Illinois Central Railway Company and the
  Chicago Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Company, was
  received by the interstate commerce commission today.

  The complaints over that J. P. Morgan & Co., of New York, have
  secured practically the control and management of all these
  various lines; that the firm has acquired “either for itself
  or for those connected with it in the management and control
  of the Southern Railway Company, the ownership and control of
  what was before known as the Louisville, Evansville & St. Louis
  Railway Company;” that, acting as trustees for the Southern
  Railway Company, they have entered into a combination with the
  Louisville & Nashville Railroad by which they secured control
  of the Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railroad Company, to
  be used for the joint benefit of the two companies and for the
  purpose of controlling traffic, that, in a further undertaking
  to control the traffic of the territory, Morgan & Company
  acquired control of a majority of the stock of the Louisville
  & Nashville Railroad Company in order to destroy and throttle
  competition and to control and regulate rates south of the
  Ohio River to the Gulf of Mexico, between the Atlantic Ocean
  and the Mississippi River.
 
  These railroads practically control the commerce, complainant
  states, of Kentucky, Tennessee, Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia,
  Florida, North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia and Maryland.
 
  J.P. Morgan, it declares, has secured control of the lines
  against which the complaint is lodged and by this control
  could dictate schedules, terms and rates to all the smaller
  roads which have not been absorbed or acquired. This places
  the commerce of the entire section under the control of a very
  few men who are dominated by Morgan & Co.
 
  The complaint states that this is in violation of the act,
  providing for the regulation of interstate commerce commission
  copies of agreements with other common carriers in relation to
  traffic as provided for by the interstate commerce act. Rates
  will be advanced, communities discriminated against, traffic
  impeded and business destroyed as it may be found necessary
  for the purposes of the combination, which violates both the
  letter and the spirit of the laws of the United States and of
  the states involved.  Complainant prays therefore that the
  committee investigate the complaint, examine the agreements,
  require the attendance of witnesses, the production of papers,
  etc., to determine the consequences, also the purposes of
  those who are in the agreement. The commission has not yet
  determined the exact date for the hearing.