Author Topic: F3 #64A [III]/ 109  (Read 31908 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Steve Dolzall

  • Monon Conductor
  • ***
  • Posts: 219
Re: F3 #64A [III]/ 109
« Reply #15 on: February 20, 2012, 11:58:37 am »
True the photo of 109 does show "chicken wire" covering the air intakes, but does not retain the "chicken wire" covering between the portholes as built.

Ron Marquardt

  • Guest
Re: F3 #64A [III]/ 109
« Reply #16 on: February 20, 2012, 12:53:13 pm »
Rick, as per your earlier request, we have no pictures of the 101 in the archives, and the only picture we have of the 51A does not show the roof fans.  There are a number of different photos that do show the high fans, among those the one Roger had of the 64 coming through the cut on Bedford hill.  / Ron

James W Smith

  • Monon Fireman
  • *
  • Posts: 43
Re: F3 #64A [III]/ 109
« Reply #17 on: February 20, 2012, 01:45:20 pm »
Ron,
I have three shots of 101 -- all 3 show 4 high fans.
2 shots of 51-A -- both show 4 high fans
2 more shots of 109 dated 1962 -- fans arranged (front to back): hi, lo, hi, lo;
standard screening at top of carbody; no chicken wire between portholes.

Next time I visit maybe we can get these scanned so you will have them for the archive.
Jim

Ron Marquardt

  • Guest
Re: F3 #64A [III]/ 109
« Reply #18 on: February 20, 2012, 02:10:57 pm »
You guys get way too hung up on things like fan configurations.  On any give day, any engine may have had a combination of high and low fans.  For example, engine 109 (with high fans) may have been in the backshop for a major overhall, and engine 101 (with low fans) may have come in from Chicago with a bad fan.  If they didn't have one to replace the bad fan, they would  have ordered one, and in the meantime "borrowed" a fan off the 109 to keep the 101 running.  When the new fan came in, they may have changed them back or maybe not, depending on the requirements of the service.

What I'm saying is that in 1948 you can't say all the fams were this way or that way.  You can't even do it for one month in 1848.  If you had good records you might be able to say it for March 3, 1948, but why would it matter.  Most modelers are concerned with modeling an era, not a particular day.  A railroad was always in flux, depending on the demands of the service.  It's just something that we as modelers have to accept.  / Ron

Rick Berg

  • Global Admin.
  • Monon Dispatcher
  • *****
  • Posts: 721
    • Rick's MONON Railroad Site
Re: F3 #64A [III]/ 109
« Reply #19 on: February 20, 2012, 05:52:15 pm »
I like that explanation......... Real RRing.

James W Smith

  • Monon Fireman
  • *
  • Posts: 43
Re: F3 #64A [III]/ 109
« Reply #20 on: February 20, 2012, 10:40:00 pm »
I would agree -- except:  have had modelers & railroaders tell me stuff like "the Monon never did that" & "109 never looked like that" -- until I pull out the photo I modeled from.  So I say "pick a photo and model what you see".

Joe Land

  • Inactive
  • Monon Engineer
  • *
  • Posts: 254
Re: F3 #64A [III]/ 109
« Reply #21 on: February 20, 2012, 10:49:56 pm »
And have some fun while building it....

Tim T Swan

  • Monon Engineer
  • ****
  • Posts: 302
  • Modeling Bedford in 1948
Re: F3 #64A [III]/ 109
« Reply #22 on: February 21, 2012, 02:55:10 pm »
It seems time for a review of the history of F3 A-B-A sets #62 and #64 before and after the disastrous collision of these two sets at Ash Grove, June 1947.  All six units had been delivered new early that same year with high fans, dual headlights, and three portholes.  A-units #62B and #64A were totaled in that wreck, along with one of the B's.  In the following months there were several unit renumberings while the MONON was scrambling to deal with its sudden power shortage, but in the end, the two A-units were replaced with 2 brand new F3A's in March 1948, carrying the same road numbers.  These new units had the newer low fans, single headlights, and only two portholes on each side.  These were the only F3 units the MONON ever had with the two portholes, and along with two A's from an EMD demo set also acquired during that time (becoming dual-service units #85), among the only units with single headlights.  The two new units were also the only ones delivered with the low fans, but later photos show that these were freely mixed during shopping with the higher fan housings.

Tim T Swan

  • Monon Engineer
  • ****
  • Posts: 302
  • Modeling Bedford in 1948
Re: F3 #64A [III]/ 109
« Reply #23 on: February 21, 2012, 03:26:18 pm »
Here's a poor image of the EMD builders photo of the replacement units 62B and 64A.

Joe Land

  • Inactive
  • Monon Engineer
  • *
  • Posts: 254
Re: F3 #64A [III]/ 109
« Reply #24 on: February 21, 2012, 03:37:31 pm »
What was the purpose of the portholes?

Roger Nulton

  • Monon Conductor
  • ***
  • Posts: 106
Re: F3 #64A [III]/ 109
« Reply #25 on: February 21, 2012, 03:41:53 pm »
Thanks, Tim.  Clearly I need to unsolder my brass high fans and replace them with low fans, then repaint the roof.  Another project to put on the list!

I have posted a photo of your more accurate model.  Hope you don't mind.

Roger

Ron Marquardt

  • Guest
Re: F3 #64A [III]/ 109
« Reply #26 on: February 21, 2012, 05:02:00 pm »
Thank you Tim, your last sentence makes my point.  / Ron

"The two new units were also the only ones delivered with the low fans, but later photos show that these were freely mixed during shopping with the higher fan housings".

Joe also asked a good question, and I have no idea what the portholes were for.  I could never figure out whether they were intended for looking in to, or out of?

James W Smith

  • Monon Fireman
  • *
  • Posts: 43
Re: F3 #64A [III]/ 109
« Reply #27 on: February 21, 2012, 05:57:29 pm »
There is a color 5 x 7 postcard with the 2 replacement F-s ready to be shipped -- horn and stack opening covered over.  You still see these for sale at flea markets, or if needed, I can get one off to Ron to scan.  Ron's point is also made by 209 as it sat at Shops forlorn and sans prime mover -- 2 hi fans & 2 lo fans.  There is also a shot of Southern F-s being returned to EMD -- sans fans.  Seems railroads probably salvaged those fans for replacement use.

Roger Nulton

  • Monon Conductor
  • ***
  • Posts: 106
Re: F3 #64A [III]/ 109
« Reply #28 on: February 21, 2012, 06:54:51 pm »
Is this the postcard you are referring to, James?
Roger

Tim T Swan

  • Monon Engineer
  • ****
  • Posts: 302
  • Modeling Bedford in 1948
Re: F3 #64A [III]/ 109
« Reply #29 on: February 21, 2012, 10:51:05 pm »
This new MononBoard is not working correctly.  Just this afternoon (2/21) I posted two messages describing the history of #64A and a 1948 builders photo showing it and its sister #62B.  WTH are they???