Author Topic: Bridge over the tippy  (Read 8258 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Jim Davis

  • Monon Conductor
  • ***
  • Posts: 101
Bridge over the tippy
« on: July 13, 2012, 07:43:31 pm »
The bridge over the Tippecanoe River.

JD

Gene Remaly

  • Inactive
  • Monon Conductor
  • *
  • Posts: 150
Re: Bridge over the tippy
« Reply #1 on: July 13, 2012, 08:58:23 pm »
Looks like this photo was shot during one of the times the lake was lowered 10-12 feet for repair work on the dam

Pete Pedigo

  • Administrator
  • Monon Engineer
  • *****
  • Posts: 259
  • MRHTS PRESIDENT #5
    • NEWX
Re: Bridge over the tippy
« Reply #2 on: July 13, 2012, 09:15:48 pm »
That is a very unusual bridge design.   I am not sure to even call it.   A Girder/truss combination of some type.  But I have never seen girders on top of a truss structure of that configuration.  Maybe Bob Wheeler can identify the type.

Pete
Pete Pedigo

Jim Osborne

  • Monon Fireman
  • *
  • Posts: 31
Re: Bridge over the tippy
« Reply #3 on: July 13, 2012, 09:34:05 pm »
I think that's a standard Pratt truss. The girders aren't anything special - the trusses are loaded only at the joints, so there needs to be a beam/girder grid to carry the tracks between the joints. You just don't normally notice them because it's hidden down at the base of the truss.

The top-loaded truss was probably used because of the high banks. A conventional bottom-loaded truss would have towered over the area, and there was obviously sufficient clearance underneath for a top-loaded truss.

Jim Wolfe

  • Inactive
  • Monon Fireman
  • *
  • Posts: 21
    • Hoosiernetwork
Re: Bridge over the tippy
« Reply #4 on: July 14, 2012, 01:18:01 am »
Thanks for posting the photos Jim. I have never seen a closeup of the South end as you have it in the 2nd. photo.  All of the stone and foundation were removed just a few years ago.

Pete Pedigo

  • Administrator
  • Monon Engineer
  • *****
  • Posts: 259
  • MRHTS PRESIDENT #5
    • NEWX
Re: Bridge over the tippy
« Reply #5 on: July 14, 2012, 09:36:32 am »
I realilze the girders are only bearing at the pier points or end of the girders.  Making the piers taller to the bottom of the girders would be a lot more preferable than the steel truss to keep maintained. 
Pete Pedigo

Robert Wheeler

  • Archivist Emeritus
  • Monon Conductor
  • ***
  • Posts: 112
Re: Bridge over the tippy
« Reply #6 on: July 14, 2012, 04:30:53 pm »
Pete & All:

To qualify the comments below I am a roadway engineer and not a structural (bridge)engineer.

I agree, I’ve never seen one like this anywhere or even in my bridge picture books. Usually the truss is under the track and doubles as the floor beam.
It looks like a truss bridge that they forgot to turn over to make it a ”deck” truss instead of a “thru” type.

A SWAG  is that they designed a Thru Curved Chord Pratt Truss beyond “the point of no return” in the design. To save 1880-1901 design costs they decided to moved the floor beams to the “top”, made the top chord straight and put the curve in the bottom chord.
Robert E. Wheeler, PE, Archivist Emeritus rewheeler@iquest.net
MONHTS Tippecanoe Member #13